Managed BCP maintains the business continuity system updated, tested and governed; DRaaS Protects technological recovery through replication, orchestration, failover, and failback. Together, they connect critical functions with recoverable infrastructure, measurable RTOs and RPOs, and periodic testing. Contracting DRaaS without BCP can recover servers without recovering the business.
Taxonomic definitions
1. Managed BCP
Recurring management service Business Continuity Plan. It keeps the BIA, critical functions, dependencies, responsible parties, contingency plans, continuity strategies, crisis procedures, exercises, evidence, and the improvement backlog alive.
It is not a document that is delivered once a year.
2. DRaaS — Disaster Recovery as a Service
Service that provides and/or operates technological capabilities to recover workloads after an interruption.
It can include replication, secondary infrastructure, orchestration, recovery plans, monitoring, testing, failover, and failback.
3. RTO and RPO
RTO — Recovery Time Objective: Maximum objective time to recover a service after an interruption.
RPO — Recovery Point Objective: The maximum amount of information, usually expressed in time, that the business can accept to lose.
AWS defines the RTO as the maximum acceptable delay between the interruption and restoration of the service; both objectives must be derived from the business needs and they condition the architecture and cost of DR.
Comparative table
| Component | Managed BCP | DRaaS | Backup |
| Critical functions | Yes | The inheritance | No |
| BIA | Yes | He uses it | No |
| People and Responsible | Yes | Partial | No |
| Crisis and communication | Yes | Not necessarily | No |
| Business departments | Yes | Technical departments | No |
| Replication | Not necessarily | Yes | Data copy |
| Failover | Government/decision | Yes | No |
| Failback | Government | Yes | No |
| RTO | Define and validate | Executes against target | It does not guarantee |
| RPO | Define tolerance | Architecture to achieve it | It depends on the frequency |
| Tests | Business + Technology Exercises | DR drills | Restoration tests |
| Continuous improvement | Yes | Yes, if it is managed | Limited |
| Objective | Continuity of functions | Technological recovery | Retrieval of information |
Technical team
Having backing does not mean having continuity
This is probably the most costly confusion in the subject.
An organization can have backups executed correctly every night and still not know:
- which application to recover first;
- who declares the contingency;
- of which systems depends;
- what infrastructure is needed;
- what data are sufficiently recent;
- who validates that the application works;
- which users require access;
- how to operate while recovery is taking place;
- How to return to the primary environment.
At Scanda we summarized it in a precise way: Reporting executed backtests and reporting proven recoveries are different metrics; only the latter demonstrates real continuity.
1. Managed BCP starts with the business, not the cloud
A managed service should start with a question:
What must continue to function even though the rest of the organization is degraded?
ISO 22301:2019, currently the international standard published for business continuity management systems, precisely proposes a system for planning, operating, monitoring, maintaining, and continuously improving the ability to respond to and recover from disruptions. ISO
In Scanda we use that logic to move the conversation towards functions, not just servers.
The service must identify:
- critical functions;
- economic and operational impact;
- departments;
- critical suppliers;
- applications;
- data;
- people;
- locations;
- infrastructure;
- maximum tolerable times;
- RTO;
- RPO;
- Degraded procedures.
NIST also establishes the BIA as a central part of contingency planning and as a mechanism for establishing recovery requirements and priorities.
2. The BIA determines how much it is worth to recover quickly
Not all applications require a 15-minute RTO.
And designing them as if they were needed could destroy the ROI.
The BIA must translate unavailability into business:
Impact due to disruption = lost revenue + halted productivity + penalties + extraordinary recovery + regulatory impact + operational effect.
Then we analyze how that impact grows:
- 15 minutes;
- 1 hour;
- 4 hours;
- 12 hours;
- 24 hours;
- 72 hours.
This is how the point emerges where it becomes economically justifiable to invest more in resilience.
The CFO's question should not be:
“How much does DRaaS cost?”
It should be:
“How much does it cost to reduce the RTO from 24 to 4 hours and what loss does it avoid?”
3. Managed BCP keeps the plan alive
The word Managed It is important.
A BCP degrades every time it changes:
- an application;
- a headquarters;
- a provider;
- an integration;
- the organizational structure;
- the responsible staff;
- cloud architecture;
- a regulation;
- an acquisition.
Therefore, a managed service must establish a cadence for:
- update BIA;
- review dependencies;
- maintain contact;
- update runbooks;
- incorporate changes;
- to perform exercises;
- record findings;
- assigning responsibilities;
- verify remedies;
- presenting executive metrics.
At Scanda, we structure continuity and recovery around BIA, BCP, DRP, RTO, RPO, minimum business functions, recovery strategies, crisis plans, tests and simulations.
4. DRaaS converts objectives into technical capabilities
Once the business defines what to recover and for how long, DRaaS takes the strategy to the technical ground.
Depending on the contracted scope, it can cover:
- continuous replication;
- protection of virtual machines;
- mixed environment;
- recovery networks;
- storage;
- orchestration;
- start sequence;
- automation;
- application recovery;
- replication monitoring;
- tests;
- failover;
- failback;
- Evidence of results.
For example, Microsoft Azure Site Recovery offers continuous replication, failover, failback, and recovery testing without interrupting production replication. It also notes that dependencies, recovery objectives, network, capacity of the target site, and failover requirements must be evaluated before configuring DR.
There is the critical distinction:
The platform can execute the failover; it cannot decide for itself which business needs to be recovered first.
5. The recovery sequence matters as much as the speed
Recuperating five servers simultaneously does not guarantee that the service will work.
Imagine an application with three layers:
- database;
- middleware;
- Frontend.
If the frontend starts first but depends on services that are still unavailable, technically there are machines that are powered on and operationally there is no service.
Microsoft documents this principle in its recovery plans: the loads must be grouped by application and lifted according to their dependencies and correct sequence.
At Scanda we take that logic a step further:
We don't first recover the technologically easy things; we prioritize what allows us to maintain the minimum functionality of the business.
6. The tests are part of the service, not a special project
A recovery strategy that is never tested remains a hypothesis.
A managed service must perform different levels of validation:
Tabletop
Executive simulation of decisions, responsibilities and communications.
Technical test
Validation of replication, recovery, access, networks and applications.
Controlled failover
Switching to the recovery environment under planned conditions.
Failback
Safe and controlled return to the original environment.
Comprehensive simulation
Technology, people, and processes work together to execute the scenario.
Microsoft recommends performing test failovers periodically, and for Azure Site Recovery, its reliability guide suggests quarterly or semi-annual exercises to validate replication and failover.
The important KPI is not:
“We have DRP.”
It is:
“What percentage of our critical functions has been successfully recovered within their RTO and RPO?”
7. Measuring continuity as a business outcome
A Managed BCP + DRaaS should have a dashboard that includes at least:
- percentage of critical functions with current BIA;
- percentage with documented dependencies;
- percentage covered by the recovery strategy;
- percentage proven;
- compliance with RTO;
- compliance with RPO;
- real-time recovery time;
- defects detected during testing;
- expired corrective actions;
- age of the last exercise;
- availability of recovery capacity;
- replication status;
- risks and single points of failure.
Our resilience model also recommends explicitly observing % of proven recoveries and real compliance with RTO/RPO, because having the objectives written down and never measuring them against a test does not demonstrate operational capability.
8. The cost of not trying is already material for the council
Serious events continue to have a significant cost.
In its 2026 outage analysis, the Uptime Institute reported that 57% of the respondents stated that their last major outage cost more than USD 100,000.
That includes costs that go beyond infrastructure:
- unperformed sales;
- unproductive hours;
- penalties;
- recovery;
- reputation;
- extraordinary attention;
- impact on customers.
The data reinforces a point: continuity should not be defended with generic fear. It should be defended by comparison. Potential loss versus the cost of reducing exposure.
9. What changes when BCP and DRaaS work together
Integration creates a complete chain:
BIA → critical function → dependency → RTO/RPO → architecture → replication → recovery plan → testing → evidence → improvement.
If any of those links break, two bad scenarios appear:
DRaaS without BCP
Technology is recovered without knowing if the business has been recovered.
BCP without DRaaS or equivalent technical capability
There is a correct plan on paper that does not have sufficient capacity to meet the established deadlines.
That is why continuity should not be bought as a separate technology.
Evidence from Scanda: from 48 hours to 12 hours
In an implementation documented by Scanda, a disaster recovery plan supported on two hyperscalers reduced the time required to restore critical services from 48 hours to 12 hours.
The data is relevant not because 12 hours should become the RTO for all organizations.
Quite the opposite, in fact.
The correct target depends on the BIA. What the case demonstrates is that Architecture, orchestration, and recovery strategy can materially modify the economic exposure of a disruption..
Predictive conclusion
Business continuity will no longer be evaluated by the existence of documents and will increasingly be evaluated by Verifiable evidence of recovery.
The CFO will ask how much financial risk has decreased. The CIO will require compliance with RTO and RPO. The CISO will need to integrate ransomware and secure recovery. Audit will require traceability. Operations will require restoring the correct functions in the correct order.
At Scanda we believe that the most mature model will be Continuity as managed capability: Updated BIA, prepared architecture, monitored DRaaS, periodic testing and continuous improvement.
Because the day of the incident there is no time to find out if the plan was correct.
Final CTA from Scanda
Does your organization have a recovery plan or evidence that it can actually recover?
In Scanda, we can start from your critical functions, BIA, dependencies, RTO, RPO, and current architecture to identify the gap between them. What the business needs to recover and what technology can really recover today.
From there we structure the roadmap: government of continuity, DRP, architecture, automation, testing, and executive evidence.
Continuity is not demonstrated when everything works. It is demonstrated when something fails and the business knows exactly what to do.
FAQ
1. Does DRaaS replace a BCP?
No. DRaaS recovers infrastructure, applications, and workloads. The BCP determines which business functions are critical, their dependencies, responsible parties, contingency procedures, and recovery priority. DRaaS is a technical capability within a broader continuity strategy.
2. What is the difference between backup and DRaaS?
Backup preserves copies of information. DRaaS adds capabilities to maintain or recover complete services through replication, alternative infrastructure, orchestration, sequencing, failover, testing, and failback. Having a backup does not guarantee that an application can be recovered within the expected RTO.
3. How can the CFO justify the investment in Managed BCP and DRaaS?
By comparing the expected cost of an interruption with the investment required to reduce its duration and loss of information. The analysis should incorporate revenue, productivity, contractual penalties, regulation, extraordinary recovery, and reputation, and contrast them against different RTO and RPO scenarios.
Español 
English